Ophélie Meunier threatened with death: "Those who dare to denounce separatism become the target of Islamists"

Former local elected representative, Céline Pina is essayist and activist.She is the founder of "VIV (r) e la République", she also published silence guilty (Kero, 2016) and these essential goods (Bouquins, 2021).

There is terrorism, the one who massacred the management of Charlie, killed Jews in a school and in a supermarket, executed police officers, shot down the spectators of the Bataclan, beheaded Samuel Paty and then there is terror, the one who'Defeat on all those who try to denounce the Islamist grip.The one who has made the life of Mila, a hell and who today threatens the life of Ophélie Meunier and Amine El Bahi.Their "crime"?None.One did only his work as a journalist, the other has given a testimony to the Islamization of the city of Roubaix.The proof that the link between Islamism and terrorism is not tenuous: to denounce one is to fall under the threat of the other.There are therefore many who live under protection;Even more numerous are those who, for having dared to open their mouths on these questions, had to move and are afraid for them and their family, the state protection service being able to face the explosion of threats.Accused of "Islamophobia", all have become targets.

To read aspophelia threatened miller and placed under police protection after the "prohibited zone" survey on radical Islam

During this time we are told that it is complicated to dismiss the Islamists who are rampant at the RATP, those who exercise in schools (the director of the AAIR de Roubaix association, seen in the report is a professor for national education), those who open clandestine schools, preachers who are rampant in mosques and on the Internet, booksellers who sell propaganda books encouraging jihad ... We also see during this report as to close schools, even obviously illegal, is not onlycomplicated but that the prohibitions are little respected and the weapons of the law rather insufficient.We are also talking about the mosque in an administrative closure and which continues to function because its leaders make fun of the injunctions of a state unable to be respected?

@iankshields @thehill it’s time these biased pontificing gas bags are put under the microscope.The hypocrisy of… https: // t.CO/LSATUEKEPQ

— Dave Wed Sep 04 11:58:00 +0000 2019

There is therefore terrorism but there is also hypocrisy of public authorities and policies.

The prohibited zone report has made the effect of a deflagration.Yet it only shows what many French people already know: the rise of the Islamist grip in certain cities and the establishment which results from a lifestyle contrary to our principles and ideals.Indeed, M6's documentary only takes into account the Salafists, the most visible of the Islamists, therefore the easiest to denounce, but it omits a whole more dangerous part of this ideology: the Muslim Brotherhood, whose strategy combining entrismAnd Double Speech is difficult to fight and the Wahhabis of the World Islamist League, which, they have completely made an alliance with the Foundation for Islam in France, a organization linked to the government and which dream of setting up a "halal tax", a real tool to legitimize a separate society and avoid sharing the same food as the disbelievers, another name of the French for these people.The worm is not only in the fruit, he tries to colonize the tree.

What happens to Ophélie Meunier is no different from what happens to Mila, here is a question of imposing rules related to sharia by using political violence and taking advantage of the weakness of power.The accusation of Islamophobia becomes the new weapon of censorship.In both cases the threat is concrete: there is a good chance that it arouses acting and the state, insufficiently capable of imposing public order, only uses to protect,When he in the means, the threatened person.The Islamist threat is effective: those who refuse to be silent immediately in their daily life and live with the sword of Damocles of the execution above their heads.Islamism is the ideology which unites within it the terrorist canal and the political channel and puts them at the service of the same objectives: the re-Islamization of people of Arab-Muslim origin and the transformation of Europe into land of Islam Islam.Whether it is the objectives of these radical movements does not mean that they will achieve their ends, but we can only see that they give themselves the means and that the blindness of the public authorities helps them.

With what happens to a young journalist whose report is not a scoop and does not have the accents of an indictment, one wonders how the freedom to inform will be guaranteed.Now this is the condition of an enlightened democracy.The question arises all the more since certain policies are in a form of complicity or cultivate the denial.The report shows us an LR mayor of Roubaix stuck in clientelist practices which bind it to enemies of our Republic.He also aroused a wave of denial in a part of the left.Once again Jean-Luc Mélenchon and the LFI have pointed out.For the leader of rebellious France, as for his spokesperson for youth, David Guiraud, this report would indict Muslims and promote racism.They thus make a sad amalgam, explaining to the whole of France that Muslims would all be violent fundamentalists, followers of faceless dolls, fighting to live separated from a Kouffars society, veiling women to better signify their refusal of theequality of human beings and their opposition to our way of life.We wonder who does dubious and dangerous amalgams here?This rhetoric of victimization, which sets in motion as soon as Islamist methods are revealed, is a known practice.It aims to make people forget the reality of death threats and potential executions, to cry over a false persecution of Muslims.It leads to protecting Islamists by exhibiting Muslims.

Read also report by prohibited zone in Roubaix: "New proof that must be rehabilitated by assimilation"

Faced with this situation, we would like the government to finally react up to the threats that we are undergoing.Clientelism was the theme of my guilty silence book, published in 2016.These practices are not ignored by anyone but the political world continues to close their eyes.Result: denouncing the Islamist grip is truly endangered, while maintaining links with the representatives of the different sects of political Islam allows in certain cities and constituencies, to take power.Courage therefore endangers while clientelism pays.We can therefore only wish that political power stops the deleterious "and at the same time", denouncing Islamism on the one hand but pact with him through his links with the Muslim Brotherhood as part of the Amif and hisImams training institute project, its reflection around Halal tax, as well as its blindness on the management of mosques constructions by cities via emphyteutic leases, one of the main tools of Islamist clientelism and the extension ofhis influence.As long as the fight against separatism will not attack the policy of influence of identity Islam, journalists, teachers, police, whistleblowers will be political targets.

To see too - Mila: "The fear must change camps"